Leadership is first being, then
doing. Everything the leader does
reflects what he or she is. Therefore,
leadership is about expressing yourself, not proving yourself. ~Warren Bennis
I recently
attended a concert—and I’ve attended hundreds over the course of my adult life—but
this time one of the musicians said something I don’t think I’ve ever heard
uttered from the stage. She said,
“thank you for letting us serve you with our music.” When she made that statement I realized one
of the reasons I had enjoyed the concert so much was that all three of the
musicians in this group were on stage to simply reveal and disclose who they
were. It was very much an expression of
their lives and they let us (the audience) sit in and listen for the evening.
As Bennis
suggests, expressing yourself could be contrasted with proving yourself. We’ve all known people dead set on proving
who they are and we’ve all slipped into this chasm at one time or another. Our efforts become a means to justify, validate
and convince others of our worth to the project, the department or the
organization. It’s very hard to be drawn
to someone trying to prove themselves; on the contrary, we tend to be repulsed
by what feels like a very self-centered existence.
Entrepreneur
Larry Wilson said that “the difference between desire and drive is the like the
difference between expressing yourself and proving yourself.” It might sound like a fine line, but the
outcome of drive without desire can be devastating. Warren Bennis said, “We must understand that
drive is healthy only when married to desire.
Drive divorced from desire is often hazardous, sometimes lethal, while
drive in the service of desire is often both productive and rewarding.”
It really comes
down to what others see first. Do they
see your drive (proving yourself) or do they see your desire (expressing
yourself)? Do they see your obsession
with hitting a sales goal or target, or do they see a genuine yearning to make
your clients’ lives better? Bennis used
the analogy of drive having to be married to desire. I’d take that a bit farther and suggest the
analogy that desire plays the leading role in your theatrical production and drive
plays the supporting role. There is a distinct
position and purpose for each but one must always be viewed as primary and the
other as secondary. In this case, the
chicken really does come before the egg.
In a Google
search for “a leader with something to prove,” the first page or so of results were
all sports-related. That leads me to
think that when the primary focus is proving something, it means there are
going to be winners and losers. When I
changed the search to “a leader with something to express,” I got results about
principled, exceptional and focused leadership.
Getting back to
my recent concert, these three musicians have not recorded a gold record but
they have been together for 20 years.
They are clearly driven given their ability to write songs, rehearse,
tour, do their own booking and maintain other jobs/sources of income on the
side. But during the concert, I didn’t
see any of that. I saw three very
talented, gifted artists who wanted to enable their audience to laugh a lot,
cry a little, and be caught up in their artistic expression.
As leaders, are
others being drawn into our artistic expression or are they being distracted by
our drive to prove our own worth?
No comments:
Post a Comment