Leaders
know that difficult conversations are best accomplished with their head and
their heart. They understand that if
they aren’t “openhearted,” the conversation can have a life of its own, and
often one that isn’t pleasant. ~ Mary Jo Asmus
Mary Jo asks the question, “Have you ever heard ‘I’m going to have a head-to-head
conversation’? Of course not, but this is what often happens in our
organizations. Having a ‘heart-to-heart’ conversation is what’s most important
when the topic is difficult. The words you will say aren’t enough (those come
from your head); you need to also have an open heart.”
This idea of being openhearted
reminded me of another word I heard someone use to describe tough situations –
being tenderhearted. For me,
tenderhearted takes it to an even greater level and consequently, degree of
difficulty. Tenderhearted is defined by
Webster’s as easily moved to love and compassion. Maybe I can open my heart, but being
tenderhearted may mean that I will actually let someone else touch my heart.
I’m sure I’ve lost a number of
folks by now because I’ve taken this to a place of too much touchy-feely
talk. Why do we think that when we walk
through the doors of our workplace that we’ve somehow left our humanity outside
on the street? Our humanity follows us
everywhere, even into the walls of our office.
And for those of us who tout practices like servant leadership or
transformational leadership, we better take notice of what it means to be
tenderhearted if we are going to actually practice what we preach.
Let me illustrate. I’ve recently come across a situation where
an individual in a leadership position was berated by a couple of employees in
an email conversation that made its way back to the leader. [Don’t you love the way technology has become
the number one tattle-tail in organizations today.] The person at fault here has openly stated
they made a mistake and can point to the exact moment when everything started
to head south. She has willingly agreed
to talk with the leader, apologize and try to make things right. The leader (as well as the leader’s
supervisor) has said she shouldn’t have to go through that and has essentially
refused to accept the apology or make an effort to reconcile the
relationship. She only wants discipline
for this employee.
I’m missing the tenderhearted
piece in this picture. This is an
organization that espouses servant leadership.
Wouldn’t that mean not only seeking forgiveness but also accepting
forgiveness when someone wants to apologize and try to make things right,
despite how much we feel hurt or disrespected?
Chuck Swindoll describes this as
having a “tender heart and a tough hide.”
It could be that having a tough hide is a prerequisite to having a tender
heart. And what a great, concise
definition of a leader – a tender heart and a tough hide. Chuck then asks the question: How do you
respond to criticism? Are you tough and
tender or do you become brittle and bitter?
Are you a leader of both grace and grit?
Do you have the heart for
leadership?
No comments:
Post a Comment